Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesEastern China Traffic Accident Case Results in 76,859 Yuan Judgment for Injured Child

Eastern China Traffic Accident Case Results in 76,859 Yuan Judgment for Injured Child

All Real CasesJune 23, 2026 5 min read

Eastern China Traffic Accident Case Results in 76,859 Yuan Judgment for Injured Child

Case Overview

In this personal injury case from Eastern China, a minor plaintiff was awarded compensation for injuries sustained in a traffic accident. The court held the defendant driver fully liable and ordered the insurance company to pay within the compulsory insurance limits. The total claim amounted to 76,859.23 yuan. The court entered judgment for 33,955.48 yuan against the insurance company and 26,829.68 yuan against the defendant driver, with credit given for amounts already paid.

Case Background and Facts

On April 4, 2010, at approximately 1:00 PM, the defendant Mr. Li was driving a small passenger van eastbound along a local road in Eastern China. At the 2 kilometer plus 100 meter mark, his vehicle struck a pedestrian, the minor plaintiff Mr. Han, who was walking in the same direction. The impact caused injury to Mr. Han and damage to the vehicle.

The traffic police department issued an accident liability determination on April 30, 2010, finding that Mr. Li failed to ensure safe driving and bore full responsibility for the accident. The plaintiff Mr. Han was found to bear no responsibility.

The plaintiff, a child born in 2002, was represented in court by his parents as legal guardians. The defendants were Mr. Li and the insurance company where the vehicle was insured under a compulsory traffic accident liability insurance policy.

Court Proceedings and Evidence

The plaintiff filed a lawsuit seeking compensation for medical expenses of 35,185.68 yuan, nursing fees of 22,063.55 yuan, hospitalization subsistence allowance of 2,928 yuan, disability compensation of 12,238 yuan, forensic appraisal fees of 720 yuan, transportation costs of 2,600 yuan, postal fees of 74 yuan, copying fees of 50 yuan, and emotional distress damages of 1,000 yuan. The total claim was 76,859.23 yuan.

The plaintiff requested that the insurance company pay within the compulsory insurance limits and that Mr. Li pay the remaining losses. Mr. Li admitted the accident occurred and confirmed the vehicle was insured. He stated he had already paid 23,000 yuan in cash and 750 yuan in medical expenses, which should be deducted from any award.

The insurance company acknowledged the insurance policy but challenged certain claims, arguing that nursing fees should be calculated at rural standards, hospitalization subsistence should be 8 yuan per day, the nursing period was excessive, and transportation costs and emotional distress damages were too high.

Evidence presented showed the plaintiff was hospitalized for 244 days with medical costs of 35,985.68 yuan. The first 41 days of hospitalization required two nurses. The plaintiff’s father, a factory worker, had average daily wages of 65.2 yuan based on three months of pay records. The plaintiff’s mother was a rural resident with daily nursing fees of 28.87 yuan.

A forensic medical examination on January 5, 2011, diagnosed the plaintiff with subdural hematoma, comminuted fractures of the left clavicle and left tibia, left scapula fracture, and multiple soft tissue injuries. The examination concluded the plaintiff suffered a 10 percent loss of function in the left upper limb, classified as a Level 10 disability.

Court Findings and Judgment

The court found the facts of the accident clearly established. The traffic police determination of liability was reasonable and was adopted by the court. The insurance company, as the compulsory insurance provider for Mr. Li’s vehicle, was required to compensate the plaintiff within the policy limits. Mr. Li, as the actual vehicle owner, was liable for remaining losses according to his full responsibility for the accident.

The court approved the following claimed amounts: medical expenses of 35,985.68 yuan, disability compensation of 12,238 yuan, forensic appraisal fees of 720 yuan, postal fees of 74 yuan, copying fees of 50 yuan, and emotional distress damages of 1,000 yuan. For the 244-day hospitalization with 41 days requiring two nurses, nursing fees were calculated at 9,717.48 yuan. Hospitalization subsistence was set at 1,952 yuan based on 8 yuan per day. Transportation costs were reduced to 1,000 yuan as reasonable.

The court entered judgment requiring the insurance company to pay 33,955.48 yuan within the compulsory insurance limits, covering medical expenses (10,000 yuan), disability compensation, nursing fees, transportation costs, and emotional distress damages. Mr. Li was ordered to pay 26,829.68 yuan for remaining medical expenses, appraisal fees, postal fees, and copying fees, with credit for the 23,750 yuan already paid. All other claims were dismissed.

Key Legal Principles

The court applied the principle of full liability in traffic accident cases where a driver fails to ensure safe driving. The compulsory traffic accident liability insurance system requires insurers to compensate victims within policy limits before the at-fault party pays remaining damages. Nursing fees are calculated based on actual caregivers’ income, with different standards for urban workers and rural residents. The court has discretion to reduce claimed amounts such as transportation costs to reasonable levels.

Practical Insights

This case demonstrates the importance of maintaining valid compulsory insurance coverage for vehicles. The insurance system provides a first layer of protection for accident victims. Plaintiffs should carefully document all expenses with receipts and evidence. Courts will scrutinize claimed amounts and may reduce those considered excessive. Defendants who have made advance payments should present clear evidence of such payments for credit against any judgment.

Legal References

General Principles of the Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China, Articles 98, 119, and 134(1)(7). Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 229.

Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.