Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesEastern China Furniture Company Ordered to Pay 13,450 Yuan in Double Wages for Unwritten Labor Contract

Eastern China Furniture Company Ordered to Pay 13,450 Yuan in Double Wages for Unwritten Labor Contract

All Real CasesJune 16, 2026 5 min read

Eastern China Furniture Company Ordered to Pay 13,450 Yuan in Double Wages for Unwritten Labor Contract

Case Overview

A furniture company in Eastern China was ordered by the appellate court to pay 13,450 yuan in double wages to a former employee who worked for nearly a year without a signed labor contract. The company argued that the failure to sign the contract was the employees fault and that a later signed contract should excuse the penalty, but the court rejected these arguments. The ruling affirmed a lower court decision, highlighting the strict liability employers face under Chinese labor law for failing to execute written contracts within the statutory period.

Case Background and Facts

Mr. Sun began working as a driver for Zhejiang XX Star Furniture Company on February 10, 2009. His monthly salary was 2,800 yuan. The company deducted 110 yuan each month from his wages for social insurance contributions. Despite the employment relationship, no written labor contract was signed between the parties during the first year of Mr. Suns employment. In 2010, the company and Mr. Sun finally executed a labor contract, with a term running from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2010. The parties later mutually agreed to terminate the employment relationship, and Mr. Sun left the company on July 30, 2010. On August 19, 2010, the company settled all wages owed to Mr. Sun for the period from January to July 2010.

Court Proceedings and Evidence

On August 21, 2010, Mr. Sun filed an arbitration claim with the local labor dispute arbitration commission. The commission issued a decision on September 26, 2010, ordering the company to pay Mr. Sun 14,000 yuan in double wages for the period when no contract was in place. The company disputed this award and filed a lawsuit in the local peoples court. The trial court found that the company had failed to prove its claim that Mr. Sun was at fault for the missing 2009 contract. The court also noted that the company had not provided evidence to support its assertion that Mr. Sun had been absent without leave for more than 15 days. The trial court calculated the double wages based on Mr. Suns monthly wage of 2,690 yuan, as defined by state regulations on wage composition. The court ordered the company to pay 13,450 yuan in double wages, covering the period from August to December 2009, and rejected the companys request to deny payment. The company appealed, arguing again that Mr. Sun was responsible for the unsigned contract and that the 2010 contract should retroactively cure the earlier omission. Mr. Sun responded that the company had failed to sign a contract from the start of his employment and that the 2010 contract was actually signed in March 2010, not January. Neither party presented new evidence during the appeal.

Court Findings and Judgment

The appellate court reviewed the facts and found them consistent with the trial courts determination. The court held that under the Labor Contract Law, an employer who fails to sign a written contract with an employee for more than one month but less than one year must pay double wages for each month of non-compliance. The court also applied the one-year statute of limitations for labor arbitration claims, as provided in the Labor Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Law, and concluded that the double wages should be calculated from August 2009. The court rejected the companys argument that Mr. Sun was at fault for the missing contract, noting the lack of sufficient evidence. The court also dismissed the claim that Mr. Sun had engaged in unauthorized absence, as no credible proof was provided. Regarding the companys argument that the 2010 contract should relieve it of liability for 2009, the court stated that this position had no legal basis. The appellate court affirmed the lower courts judgment in full, ordering the company to pay 13,450 yuan in double wages and bear the costs of the appeal.

Key Legal Principles

The court applied the principle that employers bear the burden of proof when claiming that an employee was at fault for the failure to sign a written labor contract. The court also reinforced the rule that the obligation to pay double wages for an unsigned contract is triggered by the mere fact of non-compliance, regardless of whether the contract is later signed. The statute of limitations for claiming double wages is one year from the date the employee knew or should have known of the infringement.

Practical Insights

This case serves as a clear warning to employers about the importance of signing written labor contracts with employees within the first month of employment. Attempting to shift blame to the employee for the absence of a contract will not succeed without strong documentary evidence. Even if a contract is signed later, the employer remains liable for double wages during the period of non-compliance. Employers should also be aware that the statute of limitations for wage-related claims begins to run from the date the right to claim arises, and delays in filing can limit recovery.

Legal References

Labor Contract Law of the Peoples Republic of China, Article 82 (double wages for failure to sign written contract). Labor Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Law of the Peoples Republic of China, Article 27 (one-year statute of limitations). State Council Regulations on the Composition of Total Wages. Civil Procedure Law of the Peoples Republic of China, Article 64 (burden of proof).

Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.