Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesEastern China Court Rules on Work Injury Compensation for Grade 8 Disability

Eastern China Court Rules on Work Injury Compensation for Grade 8 Disability

All Real CasesMay 30, 2026 5 min read

Eastern China Court Rules on Work Injury Compensation for Grade 8 Disability

Case Overview
A civil court in Eastern China ruled on a work injury compensation dispute between an employee and his employer, awarding the worker a total of 45,819.30 yuan in benefits for a grade 8 disability. The case involved key issues regarding the calculation of lump-sum disability subsidies and medical employment subsidies under Chinese labor law. The court rejected the employee’s claim for transportation expenses due to lack of supporting evidence.

Case Background and Facts
Mr. Ding, the plaintiff, began working for Ningbo Shunxiang Industrial Company in July 2008 as an operator in the polyester staple fiber workshop. The parties had signed a labor contract, and the employer had enrolled Mr. Ding in work injury insurance. On September 10, 2008, at approximately 10:16 PM, while handling tangled fibers on a guide roller, Mr. Ding’s right hand was pulled into the machinery, causing severe injuries to his right upper arm, head, face, and right ear. He was diagnosed with a humeral fracture, right ear laceration, head and facial trauma, and later radial nerve injury. Mr. Ding underwent two hospitalizations totaling 38 days. The employer paid all medical expenses and provided 3,750 yuan in wages during the停工留薪期 (medical treatment period). Mr. Ding returned to work on February 2, 2009, but later submitted a written request to terminate the labor contract on June 17, 2010, citing incomplete recovery and inability to perform his duties. The local labor bureau recognized the injury as work-related, and the labor ability assessment committee classified his disability as grade 8.

Court Proceedings and Evidence
Mr. Ding filed a lawsuit after being dissatisfied with the arbitration award from the local labor arbitration committee. He requested the court to order the employer to pay a lump-sum disability subsidy of 17,000 yuan, a one-time medical subsidy of 18,252.50 yuan, a one-time employment subsidy of 18,252.50 yuan, and transportation expenses of 200 yuan. The employer argued that the disability subsidy had already been calculated and allocated by the social insurance authority at 13,003.30 yuan, and that the medical and employment subsidies should be based on the local average monthly wage of 2,344 yuan, resulting in 16,408 yuan each. The employer also disputed the transportation claim, stating that the company had provided transport during Mr. Ding’s treatment. Both parties submitted evidence, including the arbitration award, a government notice on social insurance calculation standards, and a benefit approval form from the social insurance office. The court accepted all evidence as valid.

Court Findings and Judgment
The court found that Mr. Ding, as an employee with a grade 8 work-related disability, was entitled to statutory work injury benefits. The court adopted the employer’s position on the disability subsidy, confirming the amount of 13,003.30 yuan as calculated by the social insurance authority. For the medical and employment subsidies, the court applied the local average monthly wage of 2,344 yuan as the calculation base, awarding 16,408 yuan for each. The court rejected Mr. Ding’s transportation claim because he failed to submit any receipts or invoices. The final judgment ordered the employer to pay Mr. Ding a total of 45,819.30 yuan, comprising 13,003.30 yuan for the disability subsidy, 16,408 yuan for the medical subsidy, and 16,408 yuan for the employment subsidy. All other claims were dismissed. The court also ordered the employer to bear the reduced court fee of 5 yuan.

Key Legal Principles
The court applied the principle that employees with work-related disabilities are entitled to statutory compensation under Chinese labor law. For grade 8 disabilities, the lump-sum disability subsidy is calculated based on the amount approved by the local social insurance authority. The one-time medical subsidy and employment subsidy are calculated using the local average monthly wage of the previous year as the base. Transportation expenses must be supported by documentary evidence such as receipts to be recoverable. The court also confirmed that when an employee terminates the labor contract after a work injury, the employer remains liable for the medical and employment subsidies.

Practical Insights
This case highlights the importance of understanding how work injury benefits are calculated in China. Employees should be aware that disability subsidies are determined by the social insurance authority, not by the employer or the employee’s actual wages. The calculation base for medical and employment subsidies is the local average wage, not the employee’s personal salary. To claim transportation or other incidental expenses, workers must retain all receipts and invoices. Employers should ensure that work injury insurance is properly maintained and that all benefits are paid in accordance with statutory standards. Both parties should also be prepared to present clear documentary evidence in court.

Legal References
Labor Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 73, Paragraph 1, Item 3
Regulations on Work Injury Insurance, Article 14, Item 1, and Article 35
Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 64, Paragraph 1
Notice of the Zhejiang Provincial People’s Government on Implementing the Regulations on Work Injury Insurance

Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.