Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesEastern China Court Grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw Lawsuit in Sales Contract Dispute Involving 800 Yuan Filing Fe

Eastern China Court Grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw Lawsuit in Sales Contract Dispute Involving 800 Yuan Filing Fe

All Real CasesJune 16, 2026 4 min read

Eastern China Court Grants Plaintiff’s Motion to Withdraw Lawsuit in Sales Contract Dispute Involving 800 Yuan Filing Fee

Case Overview

A civil court in Eastern China has issued a ruling granting a plaintiff company’s request to voluntarily withdraw its lawsuit against two individual defendants in a sales contract dispute. The court approved the withdrawal after the plaintiff filed a motion to discontinue the proceedings. The case was concluded with the plaintiff bearing half of the original filing fee.

Case Background and Facts

The plaintiff, a company referred to as Daqi Industry and Trade Co., Ltd., initiated legal proceedings against two individuals, Mr. Zhou and Ms. Xu, regarding a dispute arising from a sales contract. The specific details of the underlying commercial transaction were not detailed in the court record, but the case was categorized as a contract dispute involving the sale of goods. The plaintiff sought legal recourse against both defendants, who were named as parties in the lawsuit.

Court Proceedings and Evidence

The case was filed with the court in Eastern China and assigned case number (2011) Shao Ping Shang Chu Zi No. 16. During the course of the proceedings, the plaintiff was represented by legal counsel, including attorneys Mr. Ding and Mr. Luo. On February 17, 2011, before the court rendered a substantive judgment on the merits of the contract dispute, the plaintiff filed a formal application requesting permission to withdraw the lawsuit against both defendants, Mr. Zhou and Ms. Xu. No evidence was presented or considered on the substantive issues because the case was resolved at the procedural stage.

Court Findings and Judgment

The court reviewed the plaintiff’s withdrawal application and determined that it complied with applicable legal requirements. The court held that the plaintiff’s request to discontinue the lawsuit was legally permissible and should be granted. Pursuant to Article 131 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, the court issued a civil ruling on February 22, 2011, formally permitting the plaintiff to withdraw the lawsuit against both defendants. The court also addressed the allocation of litigation costs. The original case filing fee was 800 yuan. Because the case was resolved through withdrawal rather than a full trial, the court ordered that the fee be reduced by half to 400 yuan, with the plaintiff solely responsible for paying this amount.

Key Legal Principles

The court applied the principle that a plaintiff has the right to voluntarily withdraw a civil lawsuit before a judgment is entered, provided the court approves the request. Under Chinese civil procedure, a withdrawal application must be examined by the court to ensure it does not violate the law or harm the interests of others. The court has discretion to permit or deny such a motion. In this case, the court found no legal impediment to granting the withdrawal. Another important principle addressed was the treatment of litigation costs upon withdrawal. When a case is withdrawn before trial, the court typically reduces the filing fee by half, and the plaintiff bears the reduced amount. This encourages parties to resolve disputes early without proceeding to a full hearing.

Practical Insights

This case illustrates the procedural mechanism for voluntarily discontinuing a civil lawsuit in China. Parties who initiate litigation but later decide not to pursue their claims can file a motion to withdraw. The court will generally grant such a request if it is made in good faith and does not contravene legal requirements. It is important for litigants to understand that withdrawing a lawsuit does not automatically bar them from refiling the same claim in the future, unless a settlement or other agreement prevents it. However, the withdrawal will result in the plaintiff bearing half of the standard filing fee, which represents a cost consideration for parties evaluating their litigation strategy. This case also underscores the role of legal counsel in advising clients on procedural options, including the decision to terminate proceedings.

Legal References

Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (2007 Revision), Article 131, Paragraph 1: This provision governs the voluntary withdrawal of a lawsuit by the plaintiff and requires court approval for such withdrawal to be effective.

Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.