Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesDecorating Contractor Wins Payment of 21,632 Yuan in Eastern China Court

Decorating Contractor Wins Payment of 21,632 Yuan in Eastern China Court

All Real CasesMay 29, 2026 4 min read

Decorating Contractor Wins Payment of 21,632 Yuan in Eastern China Court

Case Overview

A small business owner in Eastern China successfully sued a restaurant company for unpaid decoration work totaling 21,632 yuan. The court ruled in favor of the contractor, ordering the defendant to pay the full amount owed under a decoration contract for lightweight wall installation. The case highlights the enforceability of written acknowledgments of debt in commercial disputes.

Case Background and Facts

The plaintiff, Mr. Tian, operated a building materials shop registered as a sole proprietorship in Eastern China. Between September 15, 2009, and October 21, 2009, Mr. Tian provided labor and materials to install lightweight partition walls on the first, second, and third floors of a restaurant owned by the defendant, a catering company referred to as the Famous Club Company. After the work was completed, the defendant issued a written statement of account acknowledging that it owed Mr. Tian 21,632 yuan for the decoration work. Despite repeated requests for payment, the defendant failed to settle the debt, prompting Mr. Tian to file a lawsuit.

Court Proceedings and Evidence

The case was filed with the local court in Eastern China on January 14, 2011. Both parties voluntarily waived their rights to a formal response period and evidence exchange, agreeing to an expedited procedure. A public hearing was held on January 17, 2011. Mr. Tian appeared through his legal representative, and the defendant company was represented by its attorney. During the hearing, Mr. Tian submitted two key pieces of evidence: a written decoration agreement for the lightweight wall installation and a signed statement of account from the defendant. Both documents bore the defendant company’s official seal. The defendant raised no objections to the authenticity or content of these documents. The court accepted both documents as valid evidence, noting they met the formal requirements for written evidence under the law.

Court Findings and Judgment

The court found that Mr. Tian had performed the decoration work as requested by the defendant. After the project was completed, both parties conducted a settlement, and the defendant acknowledged the outstanding balance of 21,632 yuan by issuing a stamped statement of account. The defendant did not dispute the amount owed but claimed financial difficulty in making payment. The court held that the defendant had a clear obligation to pay the agreed sum without delay. Citing Article 109 of the Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China, the court ruled that the defendant must pay Mr. Tian the full amount of 21,632 yuan within ten days of the judgment taking effect. The court also ordered the defendant to bear the reduced court filing fee of 170 yuan. If the defendant failed to pay on time, it would be subject to double interest on the overdue amount as prescribed by law.

Key Legal Principles

The court applied the principle that a debtor must fulfill its payment obligations under a valid contract. Article 109 of the Contract Law provides that if one party fails to pay the price or remuneration, the other party may demand payment. The court emphasized that a written acknowledgment of debt, such as a signed statement of account, constitutes sufficient evidence of an obligation to pay. The case also illustrates that financial difficulty is not a valid defense for non-payment when the debt is undisputed.

Practical Insights

This case offers useful lessons for contractors and small business owners. Obtaining a written acknowledgment of debt from the client after completing work is critical for enforcing payment. Even an informal document, if signed or stamped by the client, can serve as strong evidence in court. Contractors should also keep copies of agreements and invoices. While the defendant claimed financial hardship, the court did not accept this as a reason to delay payment. Business owners should be aware that courts in China generally enforce clear contractual debts, and delay may result in additional interest and legal costs.

Legal References

Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 109: If one party fails to pay the price or remuneration, the other party may require the party to pay the price or remuneration.

Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 128 (relevant provisions on enforcement of judgments).

Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.