Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesCourt Rules Security Guard Entitled to Overtime Pay of 14,569 Yuan for Rest Days and Public Holidays

Court Rules Security Guard Entitled to Overtime Pay of 14,569 Yuan for Rest Days and Public Holidays

All Real CasesMay 22, 2026 4 min read

Court Rules Security Guard Entitled to Overtime Pay of 14,569 Yuan for Rest Days and Public Holidays

CASE OVERVIEW

A civil court in Southern China has ruled that a property management company must pay a former security guard overtime compensation totaling 14,569 yuan for work performed on rest days and statutory public holidays between October 2008 and August 2010. The court partially upheld the employee’s claims while rejecting demands for additional holiday pay where the employer had provided adequate time off.

CASE BACKGROUND AND FACTS

The defendant, Mr. Zhong, was employed by the plaintiff property management company as a security guard starting on October 3, 2008. His duties included gatekeeping and visitor registration at a designated site. Mr. Zhong worked on a three-shift rotation system, with each shift lasting eight hours. He worked seven days per week.

His monthly salary was initially 800 yuan and was increased to 810 yuan in April 2010. During his employment, Mr. Zhong repeatedly requested a written labor contract, social insurance coverage, and proper holiday arrangements. The company manager allegedly deferred these requests without resolution.

In August 2010, the company asked Mr. Zhong and other employees to sign a duty agreement that they considered non-compliant with labor laws. After expressing objections, Mr. Zhong was effectively dismissed on September 11, 2010. The company later provided a written notice of termination only after persistent demands from the employee.

COURT PROCEEDINGS AND EVIDENCE

Mr. Zhong filed a labor dispute application seeking overtime pay for statutory holidays and extended working hours totaling 15,557.94 yuan, plus high-temperature subsidies of 1,500 yuan for 2009 and 2010. The local labor arbitration commission issued an award on November 10, 2010, ordering the company to pay 11,536.51 yuan in overtime compensation and dismissing the remaining claims.

The company challenged the arbitration award in court, arguing that it had properly observed holidays for National Day and Spring Festival and therefore owed no overtime. The company requested the court to set aside the arbitration decision entirely.

The court reviewed written evidence including company notices, the termination letter, and witness testimony from both parties. Attempts at mediation failed.

COURT FINDINGS AND JUDGMENT

The court applied the State Council regulations on working hours, which mandate a standard 40-hour work week. Because Mr. Zhong worked 56 hours per week, the court calculated rest day overtime at 200% of normal wages.

For the period from October 2008 to March 2010, rest day overtime was calculated as 800 yuan per month divided by 21.75 days per month, divided by 8 hours per day, multiplied by 16 excess hours per week over 72 weeks, at 200%, totaling 10,593 yuan. For April to August 2010, the same formula using 810 yuan monthly salary over 20 weeks yielded 2,979 yuan. Combined rest day overtime came to 13,572 yuan.

Regarding statutory holiday pay, the court found that the employee had received three days off for National Day 2009, three days for Spring Festival 2009, and four days for Spring Festival 2010. These periods were properly compensated with time off. However, the court ordered payment for remaining unpaid statutory holidays: 662 yuan for the period from October 2008 to March 2010, and 335 yuan for three holidays in 2010 (Qingming, Labor Day, and Dragon Boat Festival), totaling 997 yuan at 300% of normal wages.

The total overtime compensation awarded was 14,569 yuan. The court rejected the high-temperature subsidy claim, noting that Mr. Zhong worked indoors and such payments are voluntary welfare benefits under applicable provincial guidelines.

The court dismissed the company’s argument that Mr. Zhong’s salary was only 600 yuan before April 2009, as the company failed to produce payroll records to support this claim.

KEY LEGAL PRINCIPLES

This case illustrates the following legal principles. Employers must compensate employees at 200% of normal wages for work performed on rest days beyond the standard 40-hour work week. Statutory holiday work requires compensation at 300% of normal wages. Employers who provide actual days off for statutory holidays are not required to pay additional holiday overtime. High-temperature subsidies for non-outdoor workers are not mandatory and are subject to employer-employee negotiation. Employers bear the burden of proving wage amounts through proper payroll documentation.

PRACTICAL INSIGHTS

Employers should maintain accurate payroll records and time sheets to substantiate wage and hour claims. Companies must ensure compliance with standard working hour limits and properly compensate overtime work. Offering compensatory time off for statutory holidays may reduce overtime liability but must be clearly documented. Employment agreements and shift schedules should be reviewed for compliance with labor regulations. Employees should keep records of work hours, pay stubs, and any written communications regarding working conditions.

LEGAL REFERENCES

Labor Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 44. State Council Regulations on Working Hours of Employees, Article 3. Measures for Holidays and Memorial Days (2007 Revision), Article 2. Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (2007), Articles 7, 64(1), and 128.

DISCLAIMER

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and regulations may vary by jurisdiction. Readers should consult a qualified legal professional for advice specific to their situation.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.