Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesCivil Court Mediation Resolves 2 Million Yuan Construction Payment Dispute in Eastern China

Civil Court Mediation Resolves 2 Million Yuan Construction Payment Dispute in Eastern China

All Real CasesMay 30, 2026 4 min read

Civil Court Mediation Resolves 2 Million Yuan Construction Payment Dispute in Eastern China

Case Overview
A civil court in Eastern China mediated a dispute between a construction company and a local government bureau over unpaid road construction project fees. The plaintiff, a state-owned road construction company, sought payment of approximately 2.25 million yuan in outstanding project fees plus interest. The defendant, a municipal housing and urban-rural construction bureau, acknowledged the debt. Through court-ordered mediation, the parties reached a settlement agreement for phased payment of the remaining balance of 2,044,305.21 yuan.

Case Background and Facts
In May 2006, the plaintiff’s first branch entered into a project contract with the defendant to construct a road pavement extension project for a provincial highway in the urban area. The contract price was 7,533,364 yuan. The project was completed and delivered to the defendant for use on June 20, 2006. On May 16, 2008, both parties conducted a final settlement, determining the total project cost at 7,737,305.21 yuan. From the time the plaintiff’s machinery arrived on site through July 2010, the defendant paid a total of 5,480,000 yuan in project fees, leaving 2,254,305.21 yuan unpaid.

Court Proceedings and Evidence
The plaintiff filed a lawsuit in January 2011, requesting payment of the outstanding project fees of 2,254,305.21 yuan plus interest of 415,800 yuan calculated from 2008 through December 2010. The plaintiff also sought recovery of litigation costs of 28,160 yuan and preservation fees of 5,000 yuan. The defendant admitted to owing the project fees but noted that during the course of the lawsuit and prior proceedings, additional payments of 200,000 yuan via bank transfer and 10,000 yuan in cash had been made, reducing the actual outstanding amount to 2,044,305.21 yuan. The defendant expressed willingness to negotiate a resolution.

Court Findings and Judgment
During the mediation process conducted by the court, both parties voluntarily reached the following agreement. The defendant acknowledged the outstanding project fees of 2,044,305.21 yuan. Upon the court lifting the freeze on the defendant’s bank account, the defendant was to pay 600,000 yuan to the plaintiff. The remaining 1,444,305.21 yuan was to be paid in two installments: 50 percent (722,152.61 yuan) by June 30, 2011, and the final 50 percent by December 30, 2011. If payment was delayed, the defendant would be required to pay interest calculated at the benchmark lending rate published by the People’s Bank of China from May 17, 2008, until the date of full payment. The parties confirmed no other outstanding disputes. Litigation costs of 28,160 yuan were reduced by half to 14,080 yuan, and together with preservation fees of 5,000 yuan, totaling 19,080 yuan, were to be borne by the defendant. The court approved the agreement as legally valid and enforceable upon signature by both parties.

Key Legal Principles
The court applied the principle of voluntary mediation in civil disputes, allowing parties to negotiate terms of payment and interest. The agreement recognized the defendant’s obligation to pay overdue project fees and established a clear schedule for phased payment. The interest provision applied the standard of the People’s Bank of China’s benchmark lending rate for overdue payments, consistent with general contract law principles on damages for delay. The court also applied the rule that litigation costs are split equally when a case is resolved through mediation.

Practical Insights
This case demonstrates the effectiveness of court-ordered mediation in resolving construction payment disputes between private contractors and government entities. Parties should maintain detailed records of all payments and communications. The inclusion of interest provisions for delayed payment provides important leverage for creditors. Government entities are generally held to the same contractual standards as private parties. The phased payment arrangement allowed the defendant to satisfy the debt over time while providing the plaintiff with immediate partial payment.

Legal References
Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, provisions on court mediation and settlement agreements. Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China, provisions on contract performance, breach of contract, and calculation of damages for delayed payment. Relevant judicial interpretations on the calculation of interest on overdue payments using the People’s Bank of China benchmark lending rate.

Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.