Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesConstruction Company Found Liable for Unpaid Wages of 15,000 RMB Under Labor Contracting Dispute

Construction Company Found Liable for Unpaid Wages of 15,000 RMB Under Labor Contracting Dispute

All Real CasesJune 2, 2026 4 min read

Construction Company Found Liable for Unpaid Wages of 15,000 RMB Under Labor Contracting Dispute

Case Overview

A construction company in Eastern China was held responsible for paying 15,000 RMB in wages to a worker after subcontractors failed to fulfill their payment obligations. The court ruled that the company, as the primary contractor with legal employment qualifications, bore ultimate liability for wage obligations under labor and employment regulations. The case involved a dispute over whether the company or its subcontractors should bear responsibility for unpaid wages to a steel reinforcement worker.

Case Background and Facts

The plaintiff, a construction company based in Eastern China, had won the bid for a real estate development project known as Shuian Xincheng. In August 2009, the company entered into an internal contracting agreement with a third party, Mr. Dong, who was responsible for managing the project. Mr. Dong subsequently subcontracted the steel reinforcement work to another third party, Mr. Xiang, and the scaffolding work to a third party, Mr. He. Both subcontracts were on a labor-and-materials basis.

The defendant, Mr. Zhang, was hired by Mr. Xiang as a steel reinforcement worker. In August 2010, Mr. Zhang and 15 other workers filed a complaint with the local labor dispute arbitration committee, claiming that Mr. Xiang and Mr. He had failed to pay their wages. The arbitration committee ruled that the construction company must pay Mr. Zhang 15,000 RMB in unpaid wages, with Mr. Dong, Mr. Xiang, and Mr. He bearing joint liability. The company challenged this ruling in court, arguing that it had no direct employment relationship with Mr. Zhang and that the subcontractors should be solely responsible.

Court Proceedings and Evidence

The case was heard by the Eastern China court in December 2010 and January 2011. Both sides presented evidence to support their positions. The company submitted the internal contracting agreement with Mr. Dong and the subcontracting agreements with Mr. Xiang and Mr. He, arguing that these contracts placed wage payment obligations on the subcontractors. Mr. Zhang presented wage sheets and a work completion report showing that he was owed 15,000 RMB. During the trial, Mr. Dong, Mr. Xiang, and Mr. He acknowledged that Mr. Zhang had not been paid this amount. The court also reviewed an arbitration award from November 2010, which had ordered the company to pay the wages.

Court Findings and Judgment

The court held that under labor and social security regulations, when a construction company contracts work to an entity or individual without legal employment qualifications, the company retains employment responsibility for workers hired by that entity or individual. The evidence showed that Mr. Dong, although acting as an internal contractor, conducted activities in the company’s name, meaning the company bore civil liability for his actions. The subcontracts with Mr. Xiang and Mr. He did not relieve the company of its obligation to ensure workers were paid. The court noted that Mr. Zhang was a steel reinforcement worker with no legal relationship to the scaffolding subcontractor, and the company’s internal disputes with subcontractors should be resolved separately. The court ordered the company to pay Mr. Zhang 15,000 RMB within three days of the judgment becoming effective and dismissed the company’s claim to avoid liability.

Key Legal Principles

The court applied the principle that employers with legal qualifications bear employment responsibility for workers hired by unqualified subcontractors. This is based on labor and social security regulations requiring construction companies to ensure proper labor contracting. The court also emphasized that internal contracting agreements do not shield a company from external wage obligations, as the contractor acts on behalf of the company. Additionally, the court reaffirmed that wage disputes must be resolved in favor of workers who have provided labor but not received payment.

Practical Insights

This case highlights the importance for construction companies to carefully vet subcontractors and ensure they have legal employment qualifications. Companies that contract work to unqualified parties assume liability for unpaid wages, even if they have no direct employment relationship with the workers. To mitigate risk, companies should require subcontractors to provide proof of compliance with labor laws and maintain clear records of wage payments. Workers should document their employment and wages to support claims in case of non-payment.

Legal References

Labor Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 50
Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 64, Paragraph 1
Notice of the Ministry of Labor and Social Security on Establishing Labor Relations, Article 5

Disclaimer

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.