Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesPlaintiff Voluntarily Withdraws Loan Dispute Case, Court Grants Dismissal with Costs of 3,770 RMB

Plaintiff Voluntarily Withdraws Loan Dispute Case, Court Grants Dismissal with Costs of 3,770 RMB

All Real CasesMay 27, 2026 4 min read

Plaintiff Voluntarily Withdraws Loan Dispute Case, Court Grants Dismissal with Costs of 3,770 RMB

Case Overview
In this loan and debt dispute case, the plaintiff voluntarily withdrew the lawsuit after filing it in court. The court granted the motion for dismissal and ordered the plaintiff to bear the total litigation costs of 3,770 RMB. The case, heard in a court in Eastern China, was resolved without a trial on the merits.

Case Background and Facts
The plaintiff, Mr. Wang, a farmer, initiated a civil lawsuit against four defendants: Mr. Zhang, Mr. Yang, Ms. Li, and Mr. Yang, all also farmers. The dispute arose from a private lending arrangement between the parties. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants owed him money under an informal loan agreement. The exact amount of the loan and the terms of repayment were not specified in the court record, as the case did not proceed to a full hearing. The plaintiff sought judicial relief to recover the alleged debt, but later decided not to pursue the claim.

Court Proceedings and Evidence
The case was filed in a court in Eastern China under case number (2011) Feng Min Chu Zi No. 855-2. After the lawsuit was accepted, the court scheduled proceedings. However, before any substantive hearings or evidentiary presentations took place, the plaintiff, Mr. Wang, submitted a written application to the court on January 28, 2011, requesting to withdraw the lawsuit. The application was made voluntarily by the plaintiff. No evidence was formally presented or examined by the court, as the case was dismissed at the plaintiff’s request prior to trial. The court did not hold any evidentiary hearings or witness examinations.

Court Findings and Judgment
The court reviewed the plaintiff’s withdrawal application and found that it complied with the relevant legal requirements. Under Chinese civil procedure law, a plaintiff may voluntarily withdraw a lawsuit before the court renders a judgment, provided the court approves the motion. The court held that Mr. Wang’s request was lawful and did not violate any legal prohibitions. Accordingly, the court issued a ruling granting the withdrawal. The formal judgment stated: “Permit the plaintiff Wang to withdraw the lawsuit.” The court also ordered the plaintiff to bear the total litigation costs, which amounted to 3,770 RMB. This sum included a case acceptance fee of 2,150 RMB and a litigation preservation fee of 1,620 RMB. The ruling was issued by the presiding judge on January 28, 2011.

Key Legal Principles
The court applied the principle of voluntary withdrawal under Chinese civil procedure law. According to Article 131 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (2007 version), a plaintiff may apply to withdraw a lawsuit at any time before a judgment is pronounced. The court has discretion to grant or deny the application. If the withdrawal is granted, the case is dismissed without a judgment on the merits. The plaintiff is generally responsible for the litigation costs incurred up to the point of withdrawal, unless the parties agree otherwise. In this case, the court ordered the plaintiff to pay all costs. This principle allows parties to discontinue litigation without a final determination of liability, preserving the possibility of refiling the claim in the future, subject to statutes of limitations.

Practical Insights
This case illustrates a common procedural outcome in Chinese civil litigation: voluntary dismissal. Plaintiffs may choose to withdraw a lawsuit for various reasons, such as reaching a settlement with the defendant, realizing the claim lacks sufficient evidence, or deciding to pursue alternative dispute resolution. Withdrawing a lawsuit can save time and legal expenses, but the plaintiff remains liable for court costs already incurred. Before filing a lawsuit, parties should carefully assess the strength of their case and the potential costs. If a settlement is reached after filing, it is often more cost-effective to withdraw early. Additionally, plaintiffs should be aware that withdrawing a lawsuit does not necessarily bar them from refiling later, provided the statute of limitations has not expired. However, repeated withdrawals may affect a party’s credibility with the court.

Legal References
Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (2007 Revision), Article 131, Paragraph 1: “A plaintiff may apply to withdraw the lawsuit before the judgment is pronounced. Whether to grant the withdrawal shall be decided by the court.”

Disclaimer
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.