Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesCourt Allows Plaintiff to Withdraw Personal Injury Lawsuit, Orders Reduced Court Fees of 5 Yuan

Court Allows Plaintiff to Withdraw Personal Injury Lawsuit, Orders Reduced Court Fees of 5 Yuan

All Real CasesMay 21, 2026 4 min read

Court Allows Plaintiff to Withdraw Personal Injury Lawsuit, Orders Reduced Court Fees of 5 Yuan

CASE OVERVIEW

A civil lawsuit filed in a Northern China court was concluded when the plaintiff voluntarily withdrew the case. The court granted the withdrawal and ordered the plaintiff to pay reduced court fees of 5 yuan, half the standard amount. The case, docket number (2011) Ping Min Yi Chu Zi No. 152, involved a claim by Ms. Xu against an unidentified defendant.

CASE BACKGROUND AND FACTS

The plaintiff, Ms. Xu, initiated legal proceedings in a Northern China court. The specific nature of the dispute was not detailed in the available records, but the case falls under the category of consumer and daily life matters. The plaintiff sought relief through the civil court system, which is common for personal disputes, contract issues, or minor injury claims in China.

The case was filed in early 2011. At some point after the lawsuit was initiated, Ms. Xu decided not to continue with the litigation. She submitted a request to the court to withdraw her complaint. The court reviewed this request and considered whether to allow the withdrawal under applicable procedural law.

COURT PROCEEDINGS AND EVIDENCE

The court proceedings were brief. The key action was the plaintiff’s motion to withdraw the case. The court did not hold a full trial or hear evidence on the merits of the underlying dispute. Instead, the court focused on whether the withdrawal complied with legal requirements.

Under Chinese civil procedure, a plaintiff may withdraw a lawsuit at any time before the court enters a final judgment, provided the court approves the withdrawal. The court must ensure that the withdrawal does not violate laws or harm the interests of the state, the public, or third parties. In this case, the court found no such issues.

The court examined the plaintiff’s withdrawal request and determined it was voluntary and proper. No evidence was presented regarding the substance of the original claim, as the case ended before any evidentiary hearings took place.

COURT FINDINGS AND JUDGMENT

The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff’s request. The judgment, issued on January 18, 2011, by Judge Che Yanxin, states: “It is ordered as follows: The plaintiff Xu Jinshu is permitted to withdraw the lawsuit.”

The court also addressed the issue of court fees. The standard filing fee for this type of case was 10 yuan. Because the case was withdrawn before trial, the court applied the rule that only half the fee is due. The court ordered Ms. Xu to pay 5 yuan in court costs, with no other costs assessed.

The judgment was entered by the court and recorded by clerk Yue Zhimin. The case was closed without any finding of liability or wrongdoing by any party.

KEY LEGAL PRINCIPLES

This case illustrates the principle of voluntary withdrawal in Chinese civil procedure. Under Article 131, Paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (2007 version), a plaintiff may withdraw a lawsuit before the court renders a judgment. The court has discretion to approve or deny the withdrawal.

The reduced court fee reflects the policy that parties who settle or withdraw cases early should not bear the full cost of litigation. This encourages efficient resolution of disputes without prolonged court proceedings.

The case also shows that a withdrawal does not constitute an admission of fault or liability. The plaintiff simply chose not to pursue the claim further. The defendant was not required to respond or defend the case.

PRACTICAL INSIGHTS

For individuals considering filing a lawsuit in China, this case highlights the option to withdraw a case at any stage before judgment. Withdrawal may be appropriate if the parties reach a settlement, if the plaintiff decides the claim is not worth pursuing, or if new information changes the plaintiff’s position.

Plaintiffs should be aware that court fees are typically reduced when a case is withdrawn early. In this case, the fee was halved. However, plaintiffs may still be responsible for their own legal costs and any fees already paid.

The case also underscores the importance of understanding procedural rules. A withdrawal requires court approval. If the court suspects the withdrawal is not voluntary or is intended to circumvent the law, it may deny the request.

LEGAL REFERENCES

Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (2007 Revision), Article 131, Paragraph 1: A plaintiff may withdraw a lawsuit before judgment is pronounced. The court shall decide whether to approve the withdrawal.

DISCLAIMER

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and procedures may vary by jurisdiction and may have changed since the date of the case. Readers should consult a qualified legal professional for advice specific to their situation.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.