Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesCourt Rules Buyer Must Pay 145,542 Yuan for Unpaid Feed Purchases in Contract Dispute

Court Rules Buyer Must Pay 145,542 Yuan for Unpaid Feed Purchases in Contract Dispute

All Real CasesMay 21, 2026 4 min read

Court Rules Buyer Must Pay 145,542 Yuan for Unpaid Feed Purchases in Contract Dispute

CASE OVERVIEW

A civil court in Southern China has ordered a buyer, Mr. Feng, to pay 145,542 yuan to a feed supplier, Mr. Zhu, for goods purchased on credit. The judgment was issued in a contract dispute involving unpaid feed supplies over a period of several years. The court ruled in favor of the seller, rejecting the buyer’s request for installment payments due to financial hardship.

CASE BACKGROUND AND FACTS

Mr. Zhu operated a feed distribution business. Mr. Feng regularly purchased feed from Mr. Zhu on credit. Starting from 2008, Mr. Feng made partial payments but failed to settle the full amount. By the time of the lawsuit, the outstanding balance amounted to 145,542 yuan. Mr. Feng issued multiple IOUs to Mr. Zhu acknowledging the debt. Additionally, a handwritten note showed that Mr. Feng had agreed to pay 20,000 yuan by October 15, 2010, but he did not fulfill this commitment. Despite repeated demands, Mr. Feng did not repay the remaining amount. On December 23, 2010, Mr. Zhu filed a lawsuit requesting the court to order Mr. Feng to pay the full sum plus court costs.

COURT PROCEEDINGS AND EVIDENCE

The court accepted the case on December 23, 2010, and applied summary procedures. A single judge presided over the public hearing. Both parties appeared in court. Mr. Zhu submitted eleven IOUs as evidence to prove the outstanding debt of 145,542 yuan. He also provided a written note indicating Mr. Feng’s promise to pay 20,000 yuan by a specific date. Mr. Feng did not object to the authenticity of these documents. The court accepted the evidence because both parties agreed on its validity. Mr. Feng did not submit any evidence of his own. He admitted the facts stated by Mr. Zhu but argued that he could not pay the full amount at once due to financial difficulties. He requested permission to pay in installments.

COURT FINDINGS AND JUDGMENT

The court found that Mr. Feng had purchased feed from Mr. Zhu on credit and had issued IOUs confirming the debt of 145,542 yuan. The court held that a buyer must pay the price for goods at the agreed time and amount. If no clear payment terms exist, the buyer must pay upon receiving the goods according to relevant law and trade practice. Since Mr. Feng failed to pay, Mr. Zhu had the right to demand full payment. The court rejected Mr. Feng’s request for installment payments, stating that financial hardship is not a valid legal defense for delaying payment. The court ordered Mr. Feng to pay the full amount of 145,542 yuan within ten days of the judgment. If Mr. Feng fails to pay on time, he must pay double the interest on the overdue amount as specified by law. The court also ordered Mr. Feng to bear the reduced court fee of 1,605 yuan, to be paid within ten days.

KEY LEGAL PRINCIPLES

This case illustrates the principle that a buyer must pay for goods received according to the contract or, in the absence of specific terms, at the time of delivery. The court applied the rule that a seller can demand payment if the buyer fails to pay the price. Financial difficulty is not a valid reason to postpone payment unless the parties agree otherwise or the law provides for installment plans. The court also emphasized that written IOUs and payment promises are strong evidence of a debt.

PRACTICAL INSIGHTS

Business owners who sell goods on credit should obtain written acknowledgments of debt, such as IOUs or signed payment promises. These documents are critical evidence in court. Sellers should act promptly when payments are overdue. Delaying legal action may increase the risk of non-collection. Buyers facing financial hardship should negotiate payment plans with the seller before the dispute reaches court. Courts generally do not grant installment payments unless both parties agree or specific laws apply.

LEGAL REFERENCES

Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (2007 Revision), Article 64, Paragraph 1.
Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China, Articles 109, 159, and 161.
Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China, Article 229 (on delayed payment interest).

DISCLAIMER

This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and court interpretations may vary by jurisdiction. Readers should consult a qualified legal professional for advice on specific legal matters.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.