Menu

HomeAll Real CasesLoan & Debt DisputesProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily
HomeAll Real CasesCourt Upholds Paint Supplier’s Claim for Unpaid Goods: CNY 16,500 Judgment in Contract Dispute

Court Upholds Paint Supplier’s Claim for Unpaid Goods: CNY 16,500 Judgment in Contract Dispute

All Real CasesMay 20, 2026 3 min read

Court Upholds Paint Supplier’s Claim for Unpaid Goods: CNY 16,500 Judgment in Contract Dispute

CASE OVERVIEW
A Chinese civil court ruled in favor of Nanjing Xinshiyuan Chemical Co., Ltd., ordering defendant Mr. Ma to pay CNY 16,500 for unpaid paint supplies. The court applied basic contract law principles to enforce a written IOU and granted judgment in default after the defendant failed to appear.

CASE BACKGROUND AND FACTS
On November 1, 2010, Mr. Ma purchased paint from Nanjing Xinshiyuan Chemical Co., Ltd., referred to as Xinshiyuan Company, in Eastern China. The total purchase price was CNY 16,500. On the same day, Mr. Ma issued a handwritten IOU to the company, promising to pay the amount the following day.

After the promised payment date passed, Xinshiyuan Company repeatedly requested payment from Mr. Ma. According to the plaintiff, Mr. Ma refused to pay, citing lack of funds. The company then initiated legal proceedings on December 30, 2010, seeking full payment of the outstanding amount.

COURT PROCEEDINGS AND EVIDENCE
The court, presided over by Judge Qin Qihui, applied summary procedures to hear the case. Xinshiyuan Company was represented by its attorney from Jiangsu Qinyuan Law Firm. The defendant, Mr. Ma, received proper legal notice of the proceedings but failed to appear in court without providing any valid reason.

The plaintiff submitted the original IOU document as primary evidence. The court also considered the trial record. Since the defendant did not attend or file a defense, the court proceeded with the hearing in his absence, as permitted by law.

COURT FINDINGS AND JUDGMENT
The court found that the IOU, dated November 1, 2010, clearly established Mr. Ma’s debt of CNY 16,500 to Xinshiyuan Company. The court held that the defendant was obligated to pay this amount promptly.

In its judgment, the court ordered Mr. Ma to pay the full CNY 16,500 within seven days of the judgment taking effect. The court further imposed statutory interest for delayed payment, requiring double the standard interest rate for any period of non-compliance after the seven-day deadline. Court costs of CNY 213 were also assessed against the defendant.

KEY LEGAL PRINCIPLES
This case demonstrates several important principles in Chinese contract law. Under Article 159 of the Contract Law, a buyer must pay the agreed price for goods received. Article 161 requires payment at the time specified in the contract or, if no time is specified, at the time of delivery. The court also applied Article 130 of the Civil Procedure Law, which allows courts to proceed with a trial and issue a default judgment when a properly notified defendant fails to appear without justification.

PRACTICAL INSIGHTS
For businesses and individuals engaged in commercial transactions, this case highlights the importance of obtaining written documentation of debts. A simple IOU, properly signed and dated, can serve as sufficient evidence to support a claim for payment in court. The case also shows that Chinese courts will enforce payment obligations even when the defendant refuses to participate in proceedings.

Sellers should note that prompt legal action can be effective. Xinshiyuan Company filed its lawsuit less than two months after the missed payment date. The court processed the case quickly, issuing judgment within one month of filing.

LEGAL REFERENCES
Civil Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China (2007 Revision), Article 130
Contract Law of the People’s Republic of China, Articles 159, 161

DISCLAIMER
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. Laws and procedures vary by jurisdiction. Readers should consult a qualified legal professional for advice specific to their situation. The case details have been anonymized to protect privacy.

This article is rewritten from public court documents for general reading only. It does not constitute legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for specific legal matters.

All Real CasesLoan & DebtProperty & Real EstateContract & BusinessConsumer & Daily

About UsPrivacy PolicyDisclaimerContactTerms of Service

© 2026 Real Case Legal. All Rights Reserved.